For each age group, there are 3- and 5-point Likert scale versions. There are also versions with simplified language for individuals with limited comprehension.
Finally, there are Person Most Knowledgeable (PMK) versions of each measure that can be completed by an individual who knows the target individual well. In the user’s manual we provide a guide to help you decide the best measure for your study. The versions of the measures are also presented below:
Measure | Recommended age of target individual | Completed by | Scoring system | Language |
CYRM-R | 5-9 | Child: Self-report | 3/5-point | Standard |
CYRM-R | 10-23 | Youth: Self-report | 3/5-point | Standard/simplified |
ARM-R | 18+ | Adult: Self-report | 3/5-point | Standard/simplified |
PMK-CYRM-R | 5-9 | Person Most Knowledgeable | 3/5-point | Standard |
PMK-CYRM-R | 10-23 | Person Most Knowledgeable | 3/5-point | Standard/simplified |
PMK-ARM-R | 18+ | Person Most Knowledgeable | 3/5-point | Standard/simplified |
Once you have selected the appropriate measure for use, we recommend a process of contextualization, which involves bringing together individuals familiar with your context to discuss resilience. This group should be made up of individuals who may eventually use the measure as well as experts (for example, young people living in a particular community, community elders, and researchers or social workers who are familiar with the community where the research will take place).
The group should discuss what resilience means to them and what factors or resources are important for individuals to show resilience. The group should also review the items in the chosen measure to determine if they are all appropriate or require alteration to obtain a more sensitive assessment of resilience. Further explanation and guidance on this process is given in the user’s manual.
Once the appropriate measure has been selected (and adapted if necessary), you should determine whether your participants are able to complete the measure themselves or whether it should be verbally administered (read to them).
Administration takes approximately 5-10 minutes depending on level of comprehension.
The statements are completed on either a three- or five-point scale. Responses are summed by the administrator to get a measure of an individual’s resilience. You can find out more about scoring and subscale scoring in the user’s manual.
Many users have translated the measures for use in different contexts. We offer those versions on our download page for you to reference. They are currently available in the following languages:
These translations have been created by researchers who have worked with the RRC. However, each translation was done independently and, therefore, we cannot guarantee their accuracy.
If you would like to create your own translation, no special authorisation is required. We just ask that you share your translation with us so we can share it with others. We recommend a translation and back translation process to enhance the validity of the translated measure (see guides by Brislin (1970) and van Ommeren and colleagues (1999)).
Please complete the order form below and submit. Once received, or team will get back to you shortly with a quote including the shipping fee.
Resilience, Adaptive Peacebuilding and Transitional Justice (2021)
Processes of post-war reconstruction, peacebuilding and reconciliation are partly about fostering stability and adaptive capacity across different social systems. Nevertheless, these processes have seldom been expressly discussed within a resilience framework. Similarly, although the goals of transitional justice – among them (re)establishing the rule of law, delivering justice and aiding reconciliation – implicitly encompass a resilience element, transitional justice has not been explicitly theorised as a process for building resilience in communities and societies that have suffered large-scale violence and human rights violations. The chapters in this unique volume theoretically and empirically explore the concept of resilience in diverse societies that have experienced mass violence and human rights abuses. They analyse the extent to which transitional justice processes have – and can – contribute to resilience and how, in so doing, they can foster adaptive peacebuilding. This book is available as Open Access.
Resilience, Adaptive Peacebuilding and Transitional Justice (2021)
Processes of post-war reconstruction, peacebuilding and reconciliation are partly about fostering stability and adaptive capacity across different social systems. Nevertheless, these processes have seldom been expressly discussed within a resilience framework. Similarly, although the goals of transitional justice – among them (re)establishing the rule of law, delivering justice and aiding reconciliation – implicitly encompass a resilience element, transitional justice has not been explicitly theorised as a process for building resilience in communities and societies that have suffered large-scale violence and human rights violations. The chapters in this unique volume theoretically and empirically explore the concept of resilience in diverse societies that have experienced mass violence and human rights abuses. They analyse the extent to which transitional justice processes have – and can – contribute to resilience and how, in so doing, they can foster adaptive peacebuilding. This book is available as Open Access.
Use the buttons below to navigate through our books & special issues, book chapters and peer reviewed journal articles.